trans•ac•tion•al pa•lav•er: January 29, 2008
Posted by breakingranks in Uncategorized.trackback
Transactional (adj, chiefly psych): relating to an interaction of an individual with one or more other persons, esp. as influenced by their assumed relational roles of parent, child, or adult.
Palaver (noun): a conference or discussion; sometimes persuasive talk or idle chatter.
This is the hub, the core, the crux, the nub, the nitty-gritty thrust and pith of where it’s at in English III these days. Your blogs should be set up by now and you should be ready to start work. I will lead you through the process as you build your sites, add content, links, images, and more. So let’s get started.
Here is your charge. Using one of the handouts I gave you, “Some Attributes of Modernist Literature,” find an attribute of Modernist literature that interests you. For example, are you interested in the experimentation with narrative perspective? How about the exploration of the interior or symbolic landscape? What about the use of time? Look over the handout and find an entry point that will allow you to explore the material. This entry point is the theme, or unifying concept, around which you will build the content of your blog. We will be studying rather intensively over the next few weeks the following, which will help you in your decision making:
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” “The Hollow Men,” Four Quartets: “Little Gidding (V)” and The Waste Land by T. S. Eliot.
So, first things first. Pick a unifying concept and start thinking about why that particular element interests you.
Ms. Baz
Mrs. Bazinet, I just want to say weblogging for English class is soooo alacrity.
It is, isn’t it? I can feel the alacrity in the room, too! 😉
Yeaaaaaaaaaah hahahah
hahaha, omg, alacrity, i totally forgot about that, good thinkin meems…
Hey, Ms. Baz, I’d like to do Perspectivism, but I was wondering if you could explain it to me a little more, because I’m kind of confused. I just want to make sure I have the right idea.
Steph, if we explore the perspective of the writing, we’re looking at who is doing the talking, what can we determine about the voice that is speaking to us, how reliable is their point of view, is more than one person talking to us, etc. Consider “I Stand Here Ironing,” “Prufrock,” “The Haunting of Hill House.” Think of it as the narrator becoming the Narrator as character, in many ways, and not representative of the author or some omniscient, all-knowing authority on what’s going on. Does that help?
Yes, it helps, thank you. I think I want to look at the others, though. Thank you for your help. I get it! =]